Out-of-Court Settlement: A Trap or a Win-Win for MNK and FG?” ——————————- #Opinion: In legal proceedings, attorneys representing a defendant can write to the Prosecutor to consider dropping a charge against their client based on the argument that the evidence presented thus far may not be strong enough to secure a conviction and that it may not be in the public interest to proceed. If the Prosecutor agrees with this principle, they may enter ‘No evidence’ in their submission. However, if the Prosecutor believes they have strong evidence that would lead to a conviction, they would likely continue with the case. In the context of the headline news about an out-of-court settlement, the situation is different. 1. The FG will demand that MNK cease his agitation for #Biafra. If MNK agrees to this demand, it would effectively mean that MNK would have to stop talking about Biafra and would no longer be able to lead IPOB, both in reality and tactically. Therefore, anyone who supports an out-of-court settlement or believes it is a good idea is either luring MNK to his destruction or has an ulterior motive, knowing fully well that the FG’s demand would be simple: drop the agitation and gain your freedom. It’s important not to be swayed by emotional thinking that political solutions equate to out-of-court settlements. If the condition for MNK’s release is for him to drop the Biafra agitation, then IPOB will continue to march forward. We have come too far to stop halfway. MNK must be freed unconditionally. IPOB in the United Kingdom 20/06/2024
Source: IPOB Liverpool centre on x
Dear Readers, Good and credible news reportage is tedious task and requires huge finances.
We are soliciting your Noble support for as low as N1,000 your support would go a long way in assisting us to continue to guarantee our readers quality news.
Bank transfers can be made to:
Account Name: Harvest and Commercial
Bank: Sterling Bank
Account Number: 0078627735